Skip to content
Practitioner guideVerified October 2026

SOC 2 for NZ and Australian SaaS: A Practitioner's Readiness Guide

What SOC 2 actually asks of a New Zealand or Australian software company: Type I versus Type II, how to scope the Trust Services Criteria, the controls auditors sample hardest, the evidence each one needs, and a 12-week path to a Type I report.

By Krish Pasumarthi, Founder, CybrGenCRISC, CEH, CDPSE

controls
19controls
Trust Services Criteria
5Trust Services Criteria
weeks to Type I
12weeks to Type I
readiness checks
8readiness checks

How to read each control

Owner tag
Who usually runs the control: leadership, engineering, or people and ops.
What the auditor tests
What fieldwork actually looks for, in plain language.
Do this first
The first concrete step towards a control you can evidence.
Evidence produced
The artefacts the auditor will request.
Framework mapping
The Trust Services Criteria it answers, and where it lands in ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Watch out
The mistake we see most often in real audits.

General information, not audit or assurance advice. SOC 2 reports are issued only by independent licensed CPA firms, and the opinion is theirs. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 mappings are CybrGen's practitioner mapping; the AICPA's published mapping predates the 2022 edition.

Stage 01

1. Scope and govern

What exactly is in scope, and who is accountable for it?

Scope decides cost and timeline. Governance, risk assessment and people controls are the foundation the auditor tests first, and they apply whatever criteria you choose.

Leadership

Define the system boundary and choose the criteria

  • Security

SOC 2 reports on a defined system: the product, the infrastructure it runs on, the people and processes that operate it, and the data it handles. A tight, honest boundary is the single biggest lever on cost and timeline.

What the auditor tests
That the system description matches what is actually in scope, and that controls cover everything inside the boundary.
Do this first
Draw the boundary on one page: the product, production cloud accounts, supporting SaaS tools, teams and data flows. Start with Security only unless a contract demands more.
Evidence produced
  • Scope and boundary document
  • Data flow and architecture diagram
  • List of in-scope systems and subservice organisations
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • DC 200 Description criteria
  • Security (Common Criteria) required in every report

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • Clause 4.3 Determining the scope of the ISMS
Watch out

Leaving a system out of scope does not hide it from buyers. If customer data touches it, expect the question in due diligence. Scope to what customers rely on, not to what is easy.

LeadershipType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the period

Name owners, approve policies and give the board oversight

  • Security

The Common Criteria start with the control environment: who is accountable, how leadership oversees security, and whether policies reflect how the company really works.

What the auditor tests
Approved policies, defined roles and evidence that leadership or the board reviewed security during the period.
Do this first
Name a security owner, approve a short policy set (information security, access, change, incident, vendor, acceptable use), and put security on the board or leadership agenda at least twice a year.
Evidence produced
  • Approved policies with version and review dates
  • Organisation chart and security roles
  • Board or leadership minutes covering security
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC1.2 Board oversight
  • CC1.3 Structures, reporting lines and authorities
  • CC5.3 Policies and procedures

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • Clause 5.1 Leadership and commitment
  • Clause 5.3 Roles, responsibilities and authorities
  • A.5.1 Policies for information security
Watch out

Policies copied from a template that describe controls you do not run are the fastest way to an exception. Write what you do, then do what you wrote.

LeadershipType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the periodException hotspot: Where we most often see audit exceptions

Run a documented risk assessment, including fraud risk

  • Security

SOC 2 expects you to identify what could stop you meeting your commitments to customers, including fraud and significant changes to the business, and to decide what you will do about each risk.

What the auditor tests
A risk assessment performed during the period, covering fraud and change, with risks linked to controls or accepted by an owner.
Do this first
Run a two-hour workshop with leadership and engineering, score the top 20 risks, link each one to a control or a named acceptance, and diarise a repeat at least annually.
Evidence produced
  • Risk register with scores, owners and treatment
  • Fraud risk considerations
  • Dated sign-off of the assessment
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC3.1 Specifies suitable objectives
  • CC3.2 Identifies and analyses risk
  • CC3.3 Considers potential for fraud
  • CC3.4 Identifies and assesses changes

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • Clause 6.1.2 Information security risk assessment
  • Clause 8.2 Information security risk assessment
Watch out

Fraud risk is a separate criterion and is easy to forget in a security-only workshop. Cover it explicitly, even briefly, or the auditor will ask where it is.

People and opsType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the periodException hotspot: Where we most often see audit exceptions

Screen, onboard and train your people

  • Security

Auditors sample new starters across the period and check that each one was screened, signed the right agreements and completed security training on time.

What the auditor tests
For a sample of joiners: background checks proportionate to the role, signed confidentiality and policy acknowledgements, and training completed within your stated timeframe.
Do this first
Add screening, policy acknowledgement and security training to the onboarding checklist, with a deadline such as 30 days, and run annual refresher training for everyone.
Evidence produced
  • Onboarding checklist records
  • Signed confidentiality and policy acknowledgements
  • Training completion report
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC1.4 Commitment to competence
  • CC1.5 Accountability
  • CC2.2 Internal communication

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.6.1 Screening
  • A.6.2 Terms and conditions of employment
  • A.6.3 Information security awareness, education and training
Watch out

Contractors are people too. If they have production or customer data access, they belong in the same onboarding, training and offboarding process.

Stage 02

2. Control access

Can you prove that only the right people reach production and customer data?

Access is the most heavily sampled area in most SOC 2 audits: how it is granted, reviewed, protected and removed.

EngineeringType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the periodException hotspot: Where we most often see audit exceptions

Grant access by request and remove it on the last day

  • Security

Access is the most heavily sampled area in most SOC 2 audits. Every grant needs an approval, and every leaver needs evidence that access ended on time.

What the auditor tests
For samples of joiners, movers and leavers: approved access requests, and removal from production, SaaS tools and the identity provider within your stated timeframe.
Do this first
Route all access through single sign-on where possible, use a ticket or form for every grant, and make offboarding a checklist triggered by HR with a same-day or next-day target.
Evidence produced
  • Access request tickets with approvals
  • Offboarding tickets with completion timestamps
  • Identity provider audit logs
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC6.2 User registration and removal
  • CC6.3 Role-based access and least privilege

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.5.15 Access control
  • A.5.18 Access rights
  • A.6.5 Responsibilities after termination or change of employment
Watch out

Tools outside single sign-on, shared admin accounts and service accounts are where removal is missed. Inventory them before the period starts, not when the auditor samples a leaver.

EngineeringType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the periodException hotspot: Where we most often see audit exceptions

Review user and privileged access every quarter

  • Security

A periodic review proves that access still matches each person's role. Auditors look at whether the review happened, who did it, and whether the changes it found were actually made.

What the auditor tests
Completed reviews for each quarter of the period, signed by an appropriate owner, with evidence that inappropriate access was removed.
Do this first
Export users and roles from production, the cloud console, code repositories and key SaaS tools, have each system owner confirm or revoke, and save the export, decisions and tickets together.
Evidence produced
  • Quarterly access review exports with reviewer sign-off
  • Tickets for access removed as a result
  • Privileged account list
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC6.2 User registration and removal
  • CC6.3 Role-based access and least privilege

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.5.18 Access rights
  • A.8.2 Privileged access rights
Watch out

A reviewer approving their own access, or a review with no changes ever, both draw questions. Separate reviewer and reviewed, and keep the evidence of what changed.

Engineering

Enforce MFA across production, cloud and key SaaS tools

  • Security

Strong authentication protects the system boundary from outside threats. Enterprise buyers ask about it in every questionnaire, and auditors test it directly.

What the auditor tests
MFA enforced on the identity provider, cloud consoles, code repositories and remote access, with password settings that match your policy.
Do this first
Enforce MFA in the identity provider and every cloud console, require it for code repositories and admin tools, and block sign-in methods that bypass it.
Evidence produced
  • Identity provider MFA policy configuration
  • Cloud console MFA reports
  • Password policy settings
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC6.1 Logical access security
  • CC6.6 Threats from outside the system boundary

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.8.5 Secure authentication
  • A.5.17 Authentication information
Watch out

Root and break-glass cloud accounts are often excluded from MFA reports. Protect them with hardware keys and show the auditor how they are stored and monitored.

Engineering

Encrypt data in transit and at rest, and manage the keys

  • Security
  • Confidentiality

Encryption is expected for customer data in every SOC 2 scope. The auditor will want to see configuration, not a statement in a policy.

What the auditor tests
TLS on external endpoints, encryption at rest for databases, storage and backups, and restricted access to key management.
Do this first
Export encryption settings for databases, object storage, backups and laptops, confirm TLS versions on public endpoints, and restrict who can manage keys.
Evidence produced
  • Cloud encryption configuration exports
  • TLS scan results for public endpoints
  • Key management access list
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC6.1 Logical access security
  • CC6.7 Restriction of data transmission and movement

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.8.24 Use of cryptography
Watch out

Data exports to analytics tools, spreadsheets and support platforms often leave the encrypted path. Map where customer data goes before you claim it is encrypted everywhere.

Stage 03

3. Operate and monitor

Would you notice a weakness or an intrusion, and fix it on time?

Scanning, monitoring and incident response show the system is watched. Monitoring your own controls shows they keep running between audits.

EngineeringType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the period

Scan, pen test and fix vulnerabilities on a timeline

  • Security

SOC 2 expects you to find and fix weaknesses on a defined timeline. A penetration test is not named in the criteria, but auditors commonly accept it as a separate evaluation of controls, and most enterprise buyers ask for one each year.

What the auditor tests
Regular scanning, remediation within the timelines in your policy, and follow-up of findings from any penetration test.
Do this first
Turn on dependency and container scanning in the build pipeline, scan infrastructure at least monthly, set remediation timelines by severity, and book an annual external penetration test.
Evidence produced
  • Scan reports with remediation dates
  • Penetration test report and retest results
  • Vulnerability management policy with timelines
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC7.1 Detection of vulnerabilities
  • CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities
  • A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
Watch out

Setting a 7-day timeline for critical findings and then missing it is worse than setting an achievable 14 or 30 days and meeting it. The auditor tests you against your own policy.

EngineeringType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the period

Log, alert and investigate security events

  • Security

Monitoring must be more than collecting logs. Auditors look for alerts that fire on meaningful events and evidence that someone looked at them.

What the auditor tests
Logging on in-scope systems, alert rules for key events, and a sample of alerts showing they were triaged.
Do this first
Centralise cloud audit logs, identity provider logs and application security logs, alert on privileged changes and suspicious sign-ins, and record each triage decision in a ticket.
Evidence produced
  • Log source and retention configuration
  • Alert rules
  • Sample of alert tickets with triage notes
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC7.2 Monitoring of system components
  • CC7.3 Evaluation of security events

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.8.15 Logging
  • A.8.16 Monitoring activities
Watch out

Alerts routed to a shared channel nobody owns produce no evidence. Assign an on-call owner and make triage leave a trail.

LeadershipType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the period

Keep an incident plan, and test it once a year

  • Security

If an incident occurs during the period, the auditor will trace how you handled it. If none occurs, they will want to see that the plan was tested.

What the auditor tests
An approved incident response plan, records for any incidents in the period, and evidence of a test or tabletop exercise.
Do this first
Write a short plan with severity levels, roles, customer notification steps and regulator obligations, then run a tabletop exercise before the period starts.
Evidence produced
  • Incident response plan
  • Incident tickets and post-incident reviews
  • Tabletop exercise record and actions
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC7.3 Evaluation of security events
  • CC7.4 Incident response
  • CC7.5 Recovery from security incidents

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.5.24 Incident management planning and preparation
  • A.5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
  • A.5.26 Response to information security incidents
Watch out

Customer contracts often set notification deadlines shorter than any regulator does. Put the strictest contractual deadline in the plan.

LeadershipType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the period

Monitor your controls, not just your systems

  • Security

SOC 2 asks whether you check that your own controls work and fix the gaps you find. This is the control that catches drift before the auditor does.

What the auditor tests
Ongoing or periodic evaluations of controls, with deficiencies reported to the right people and tracked to closure.
Do this first
Run a monthly control health check: are access reviews, scans, training and backups on schedule? Log any misses as deficiencies with owners and dates.
Evidence produced
  • Monthly control health checks
  • Deficiency log with owners and closure dates
  • Internal review or readiness assessment report
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations
  • CC4.2 Evaluates and communicates deficiencies

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • Clause 9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
  • Clause 9.2 Internal audit
  • Clause 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
Watch out

This is where Type II is won or lost. A control that runs eleven months out of twelve is an exception. Someone has to own the calendar.

Stage 04

4. Change management

Is every production change reviewed, tested and approved?

For a SaaS company this is the core of SOC 2. Auditors sample changes across the whole period, including the emergency ones.

EngineeringType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the periodException hotspot: Where we most often see audit exceptions

Review, test and approve every production change

  • Security

For a SaaS company, change management is the core of SOC 2. Auditors sample changes across the period and check that each was reviewed, tested and approved before it reached production.

What the auditor tests
For a sample of production changes: a ticket or pull request, peer review by someone other than the author, passing tests, and controlled deployment.
Do this first
Protect the main branch, require at least one reviewer who is not the author, run automated tests in the pipeline, and deploy only through the pipeline.
Evidence produced
  • Branch protection settings
  • Sample pull requests with reviews and test results
  • Deployment logs from the pipeline
  • Emergency change records
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC8.1 Change management

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.8.32 Change management
  • A.8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments
Watch out

Admins who can bypass branch protection, and direct database or console changes, are the classic exceptions. Restrict the bypass, log its use and review it.

Engineering

Build security into the development life cycle

  • Security

Auditors and buyers increasingly ask how security is designed in, not just tested at the end. A light, written secure development standard covers most of it.

What the auditor tests
A defined secure development process, security considered in design for significant changes, and separation between development and production data.
Do this first
Write a two-page secure development standard covering threat review for significant features, secrets handling, dependency management and use of production data in testing.
Evidence produced
  • Secure development standard
  • Design review or threat model records for significant changes
  • Secrets scanning configuration
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC8.1 Change management
  • CC7.1 Detection of vulnerabilities

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.8.25 Secure development life cycle
  • A.8.28 Secure coding
  • A.8.33 Test information
Watch out

Copying production data into test environments brings those environments into scope. Use synthetic or masked data, or control test like production.

Stage 05

5. Vendors and resilience

Do you rely on suppliers you have never assessed, or backups you have never restored?

Your report depends on your cloud provider and other subservice organisations, and on your ability to recover from failure.

LeadershipType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the periodException hotspot: Where we most often see audit exceptions

Assess vendors and map your cloud provider's controls

  • Security

Your SOC 2 relies on your cloud provider and other subservice organisations. You need to show you assess vendors, review their reports, and operate the controls their reports say you must.

What the auditor tests
A vendor inventory, risk-based reviews during the period, and review of subservice organisation SOC reports, including the complementary controls they expect from you.
Do this first
List vendors with access to customer data or production, collect current SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence for the critical ones, and record which complementary controls you operate.
Evidence produced
  • Vendor inventory with risk tiers
  • Vendor review records
  • Subservice organisation SOC reports with review notes
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC9.2 Vendor and business partner risk
  • DC 200 Complementary subservice organisation controls

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.5.19 Information security in supplier relationships
  • A.5.21 Managing information security in the ICT supply chain
  • A.5.22 Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services
Watch out

Reviewing a cloud provider's SOC 2 means reading its complementary user entity controls and proving you do them. Filing the PDF is not a review.

EngineeringType II focus: Runs on a cadence; a Type II auditor samples it across the period

Back up, replicate and test recovery

  • Security
  • Availability

Recovery sits in the Common Criteria and becomes central if you include Availability. Auditors want to see backups running, restores tested and a continuity plan that matches your commitments.

What the auditor tests
Backup configuration and monitoring, a restore test during the period, and, for Availability, capacity monitoring and a tested recovery plan.
Do this first
Confirm automated backups for every production data store, run and document a restore test, and align recovery objectives with what your contracts promise.
Evidence produced
  • Backup configuration and job monitoring
  • Restore test record
  • Business continuity and disaster recovery plan with test results
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC7.5 Recovery from security incidents
  • CC9.1 Business disruption risk mitigation
  • A1.2 Recovery infrastructure and backups
  • A1.3 Recovery plan testing

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • A.8.13 Information backup
  • A.8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
  • A.5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
Watch out

Do not add Availability to scope just because uptime matters. Add it when you commit to uptime or recovery times contractually, and be ready to evidence capacity planning too.

Stage 06

6. Get audit-ready

Could an auditor start fieldwork next week?

The system description, a single home for evidence and an auditor engaged early are what turn implemented controls into a clean report.

Leadership

Write the system description

  • Security

Every SOC 2 report contains management's description of the system, written against the AICPA description criteria. The auditor gives an opinion on whether it is fairly presented.

What the auditor tests
That the description covers services, infrastructure, software, people, data, procedures, commitments and complementary controls, and matches what the auditor observes.
Do this first
Draft the description early from your scope document, then update it as controls are implemented. Include the complementary user entity controls your customers must operate.
Evidence produced
  • Draft system description
  • Service commitments and system requirements
  • List of complementary user entity controls
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • DC 200 Description criteria

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • Clause 4.3 Determining the scope of the ISMS
  • Clause 7.5 Documented information
Watch out

Marketing language does not belong in a system description. Every statement in it is something the auditor may test.

Leadership

Centralise evidence and run a readiness test

  • Security

Evidence scattered across a dozen tools is where audits slip. Collect it in one system of record, then run a mock audit before the real one.

What the auditor tests
Not tested directly, but it decides how smoothly fieldwork runs and how many follow-up requests you receive.
Do this first
Map each control to the evidence it produces and where that evidence lives, then have someone independent of the work sample it as an auditor would.
Evidence produced
  • Control and evidence matrix
  • Readiness assessment report
  • Remediation log for readiness findings
Framework mapping

SOC 2 (2017 TSC)

  • CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

  • Clause 9.2 Internal audit
Watch out

A compliance automation platform collects evidence and tracks tasks. It does not design your controls, run them, or issue an opinion. The report still comes from a CPA firm testing what you actually do.

Leadership

Engage the CPA firm early and agree the report form

  • Security

Only an independent licensed CPA firm can issue a SOC 2 report. The firm's scope, sampling approach and calendar shape your plan, so engage them before you finish building controls.

What the auditor tests
Not a control, but auditor independence is what makes the report credible: your readiness advisor cannot be your auditor.
Do this first
Shortlist firms that audit SaaS companies your size, confirm the report form your customers will accept, and agree the Type I date or Type II period before you lock the plan.
Evidence produced
  • Engagement letter
  • Agreed report type, scope and period
  • Fieldwork calendar and request list
Watch out

In New Zealand and Australia, controls assurance can also be reported under SAE 3150 or ASAE 3150, sometimes combined with SOC 2. Confirm which report your buyers need before you sign.

Scope

The five Trust Services Criteria, and when to include each

Security is mandatory. The other four are included only when they match what you promise customers. Each one adds controls, evidence and audit effort.

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria and when to include each
Security (Common Criteria) Always. It is required in every SOC 2 report.
AvailabilityYou commit to uptime or recovery times in contracts or service levels.
ConfidentialityYou hold customer information designated as confidential, such as financial data, source material or intellectual property.
Processing IntegrityCustomers rely on you to process transactions or calculations completely and accurately, such as payments, payroll or billing.
PrivacyYou collect personal information directly from individuals and make commitments about how it is used. Many B2B platforms cover personal data through Security and Confidentiality instead.

Scoping tightly is the single biggest lever on cost and timeline. Add a category when a customer or contract needs it, not by default.

Report types

Type I, Type II and the other questions buyers ask

SOC 2 report types and related documents
Type IAn opinion that controls are suitably designed and implemented as at a specific date. Faster, and often enough to unblock a first enterprise deal.
Type IIAn opinion that controls operated effectively across a period, commonly 3 to 12 months. What mature buyers ultimately expect.
Your first Type II periodMany teams start with a shorter first period, then move to 12-month periods so reports run back to back.
Bridge letterA letter from you, not the auditor, covering the gap between your report's period end and today. Buyers often ask for one.
SOC 1Covers controls relevant to customers' financial reporting, such as payroll or billing platforms. A different report from SOC 2.
SOC 3A short, general-use version of a SOC 2 that you can publish. It does not replace the full report in due diligence.
The path

From zero to Type I in about 12 weeks

With a tight scope and an engaged team. Each phase ends with something you can show.

  1. Weeks 1 to 2

    Phase 1: Scope and gap

    1. 1.Define the boundary and choose the criteria
    2. 2.Run the gap assessment against the Trust Services Criteria
    3. 3.Shortlist and brief CPA firms

    Exit criteria

    A scoped readiness roadmap and an auditor conversation under way.

  2. Weeks 2 to 5

    Phase 2: Design and policy

    1. 1.Design controls to meet each criterion
    2. 2.Draft and approve the policy set
    3. 3.Define the evidence each control will produce

    Exit criteria

    Every criterion has a designed control, an owner and an evidence source.

  3. Weeks 5 to 10

    Phase 3: Implement and evidence

    1. 1.Implement controls and evidence workflows
    2. 2.Draft the system description
    3. 3.Run a readiness test and fix what it finds

    Exit criteria

    A complete audit package and a description that matches reality.

  4. Weeks 10 to 12

    Phase 4: CPA fieldwork

    1. 1.Support fieldwork and respond to requests
    2. 2.Resolve any findings before the report is issued
    3. 3.Start operating for the Type II period

    Exit criteria

    A Type I report, and controls already running for Type II.

Self-assessment

Are you audit-ready?

If you can say yes to most of these honestly, you are close. If not, that is exactly what a gap assessment surfaces.

From the field

Where readiness stalls

  • Treating it as a document exercise

    Policies without implemented controls fail at fieldwork. The controls have to exist and operate, not just be written down.

  • Buying a platform and calling it SOC 2

    Automation helps collect evidence. It does not design controls, run them or issue an opinion. Buyers know the difference.

  • Scoping too broadly

    Pulling in optional criteria you do not need multiplies effort and cost for no commercial gain.

  • Scattered evidence

    If evidence lives across a dozen tools with no system of record, you will scramble at audit and risk gaps.

  • Engaging the auditor too late

    The CPA firm's scope and timing shape your plan. Involve them early, not when controls are already built.

  • Confusing Type I with Type II

    Passing Type I is a point in time. Type II is won by operating every control, every month, for the whole period.

One control set

SOC 2 and ISO 27001: build once, report twice

The two frameworks overlap heavily. Design the controls once against both and the second becomes an extension, not a new project.

How SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 27001 compare
ControlsMost SOC 2 security controls land on ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A. Each card above shows where.
Risk assessmentBoth require one. ISO 27001 adds a formal risk treatment plan and a Statement of Applicability.
Management systemISO 27001 adds clauses 4 to 10: context, leadership, objectives, internal audit, management review and continual improvement.
What you receiveSOC 2 is an attestation report from a CPA firm, usually shared under NDA. ISO 27001 is a certificate from a certification body, which you can publish.
CycleSOC 2 Type II reports cover a period and are typically renewed every year. ISO 27001 certification runs a three-year cycle with annual surveillance audits.

One control model, mapped once to every framework you answer to, is what keeps the second, third and fourth framework from becoming separate projects.

Regional overlays

SOC 2 in New Zealand and Australia

New Zealand

SOC 2 for US and enterprise buyers; SAE 3150 as the local controls assurance standard

  • SOC 2 is commonly requested by US and enterprise buyers of New Zealand software.
  • The XRB's SAE 3150 Assurance Engagements on Controls is the NZ standard for assurance over the design, implementation and operation of controls. A revised version applies to periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026.
  • Some engagements are reported under SAE 3150 alongside SOC 2. Confirm the report form your customers accept before you engage an auditor.
  • Privacy Act 2020 obligations, including notifiable breach reporting, sit alongside SOC 2 and are not satisfied by it.
  • Government agencies assess suppliers against their own requirements, such as NZISM and the Protective Security Requirements. A SOC 2 report supports that review but does not replace it.

Australia

SOC 2 common; ASAE 3150, IRAP and APRA standards for some buyers

  • ASAE 3150 Assurance Engagements on Controls is the Australian equivalent of the NZ standard.
  • Government buyers of cloud services may expect an IRAP assessment against the Information Security Manual instead of, or alongside, SOC 2.
  • APRA-regulated customers assess suppliers under CPS 234 Information Security. CPS 230 Operational Risk Management, in force since 1 July 2025, raises the bar on oversight of material service providers.
  • Expect regulated buyers to use your SOC 2 as evidence in their own due diligence, not as a substitute for it.
FAQ

Questions we get asked

How long does SOC 2 take for a New Zealand or Australian SaaS company?

A focused Type I typically takes about 12 weeks from scoping to report when the scope is tight and the team is engaged. Type II adds an observation period, commonly 3 to 12 months, followed by fieldwork.

What is the difference between SOC 2 Type I and Type II?

Type I is an opinion that controls are suitably designed and implemented at a specific date. Type II is an opinion that they operated effectively across a period, commonly 3 to 12 months. Type I proves design; Type II proves discipline.

Who can issue a SOC 2 report?

Only an independent licensed CPA firm. Your readiness advisor cannot be your auditor, and no software platform can issue a report. Keeping readiness and audit separate is what makes the report credible.

Do we need all five Trust Services Criteria?

No. Security, the Common Criteria, is required in every SOC 2. Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity and Privacy are included only when they match commitments you make to customers.

Does a compliance automation platform make us SOC 2 compliant?

No. Automation platforms help collect evidence and track tasks, which is useful. They do not design your controls, operate them or issue an opinion. A SOC 2 report comes from a CPA firm testing what your team actually does.

Does SOC 2 require a penetration test?

Not by name. The criteria expect you to evaluate whether controls work and to manage vulnerabilities, and auditors commonly accept a penetration test as evidence of both. Most enterprise buyers ask for an annual test regardless.

Should a New Zealand company choose SOC 2 or ISO 27001?

Let your buyers decide. US buyers usually ask for SOC 2. Many UK, European, Asian and public sector buyers prefer ISO 27001. Many companies end up with both, so design one control set that maps to each.

Selling to enterprise and need a SOC 2?

CybrGen runs SOC 2 readiness end to end: we design and implement your controls, prepare the evidence, and work alongside an independent CPA firm through fieldwork to the report. When we run readiness together and your controls are implemented as designed, we stand behind the Type I outcome.